Restricted Resources Challenge: availability of memory (RAM)
Dear Organizers,
I understand that, at this point, the "hidden instances" are not revealed to the participants. Having a separate set of instances for the overall performance assessment is part of the fun. However, may I please ask about some sensible bounds that can be assumed for the "hidden" datasets...
Currently, we have at most 55 days, 7 machines, 418 locations, 1200 requests, and 125 technicians (not necessarily all in a single instance). Can we assume a factor K that bounds the size of the aforementioned attributes, e.g., K=3 (which would yield at most three times the current numbers)? I am asking as this could become relevant for functions that allocate a larger chunk of memory.
Thank you and kind regards,
MJG
I understand that, at this point, the "hidden instances" are not revealed to the participants. Having a separate set of instances for the overall performance assessment is part of the fun. However, may I please ask about some sensible bounds that can be assumed for the "hidden" datasets...
Currently, we have at most 55 days, 7 machines, 418 locations, 1200 requests, and 125 technicians (not necessarily all in a single instance). Can we assume a factor K that bounds the size of the aforementioned attributes, e.g., K=3 (which would yield at most three times the current numbers)? I am asking as this could become relevant for functions that allocate a larger chunk of memory.
Thank you and kind regards,
MJG
<hidden> - January 22, 2019 10:43 AM
2 Replies: